Aside from
an awkward
moment at a rally in Redding, California in which he pointed out a single
African-American in the crowd, Trump has been rather subdued on the subject of
relations between blacks and whites. He
spoke approvingly when a crowd of his supporters “roughed
up” a “”Black Lives Matter” activist at one of his rallies, but his
comments were more focused on the fact that the activist was disrupting the
rally, not on race relations in general or on the “Black Lives Matter” movement
in particular.
In
February, The Huffington Post posted an
article purporting to give 10 examples of racist behavior on the part of
Mr. Trump. While it includes Mr. Trump’s
infamous inquiry into whether President Obama was born in the United States and
his failure to disavow, in a forthright way, the support he is receiving from
white supremacist groups, most of the examples involve clearly racist things
said or done by others on his behalf. The article also includes his notorious
comments about Muslims and Latinos.
In fact,
though African-American commentator Tavis Smiley has called Mr. Trump a “religious
and racial arsonist,” he’s also noted
that Mr. Trump has a large number of elite African-American friends who seem
genuinely to like him. And, given
tensions between blacks and Hispanics over competition for low wage jobs,
conversations with average African-American voters have lead Smiley to believe
that blacks don’t think anything Mr. Trump has said or done is “necessarily or
automatically disqualifying.”
On the
other hand, Mr. Trump has publically disagreed with comments the late Justice
Antonin Scalia made about African-Americans during oral arguments in an
important affirmative
action case . Scalia, Trump
said, was “very tough to the African-American community.”
That’s why
new data from the American
National Election Study is so interesting. Completed by 1200 adults in late January, it included
a battery of questions designed to measure what political scientists call
“racial resentment.” Racial resentment
or “symbolic racism” are “racist
attitudes that are expressed in a way that is seemingly neutral, but still
animates racial anger.” The concept is helpful in measuring racism, particularly
because it has become unacceptable or “politically incorrect” to express
opinions that are outwardly hostile toward members of various racial groups.
One of the
questions in the battery, for example, asks people to agree or disagree with the
following statement:
It’s really a matter of some people
not trying hard enough; if black people would only try harder they could be
just as well off as whites.
Agreeing with statements like these leads to high scores on
a scale of racial resentment that runs from 0 to 100. High scores on the scale indicate high levels
of racial resentment.
I used the
scale to predict the level of warmth respondents felt toward Mr. Trump and
several other presidential candidates, measured by “feeling thermometer”
questions also included in the survey.
After controlling for race, educational attainment, gender, family
income and “born again” status, I found that levels of racial resentment
influenced how warmly Republicans felt about eight of the candidates
campaigning for their parties’ respective presidential nominations.
As Figure 1
shows, racial resentment had the largest effect, among
Figure 1
Republicans, on feelings of warmth toward Donald Trump. For every 10 point increase on the racial
resentment scale, Republican respondents feelings of warmth toward Donald Trump’s
increased by almost 7 points as measured on the 100 point feeling thermometer. Ted Cruz was the only other Republican
presidential candidate who benefited from increasing racial resentment. For him, that increase was half of what it
was for Donald Trump.
Racial
resentment didn’t affect levels of warmth felt for Marco Rubio, Ben Carson or
Carly Fiorina in any statistically significant way. And for Jeb Bush, increasing racial
resentment led to the same kind of effect—a reduction in warm feelings--as it
did for Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders.
For the
sake of comparison, I also calculated the extent to which resentment of
political correctness—one of Mr. Trump’s key campaign themes—affected warm
feelings among Republicans toward him and to the other 7 presidential candidates. Republicans who thought Americans had become
too politically correct didn’t feel any differently about Donald Trump than Republicans
who felt that current levels of political correctness were more or less
appropriate.
For Republicans
who object to current levels of political correctness, the largest
statistically significant effect was to increase feelings of warmth for Ted
Cruz by 20 points and Carly Fiorina by 30 points. Those same feelings about political
correctness decreased any warmth Republicans felt toward Hillary Clinton by
over 20 points.
There are
two takeaways from this analysis of the ANES data. The first is that race continues to be an
animating factor in Republican politics, even if the front-running candidate
has not made a campaign issue of it the way that, say, George Wallace did in
the 1960s. Some Republican voters apparently
hear, in Trump’s call to “make America great again,” a chance to return to a
time when whites were dominant and people of color “knew their place.”
The second
is that there are clear lines of cleavage in the Republican coalition on the
issue of race that may be subsumed in the more general cultural conservatism
espoused by politicians such as Ted Cruz.
It may be that racial and social conservatives—voters supporting Donald
Trump and Ted Cruz—are beginning to part ways with the socially and racially
tolerant Republican voters who are more interested in economic and national
defense policy. This parting of the ways
may be the precursor of a new and viable center right American political party
capable of attracting some of the voters the Republican party currently
repels.
No comments:
Post a Comment