I teach a
college level introductory course on American government and politics. I love teaching this course because it
provides an opportunity to wrestle with some of the key questions about
American democracy. Like if there is any.
What is
going on in Michigan now provides a compelling case study about why democracy
is important and what happens without it.
The
population of Flint, a financially strapped city in what used to be a booming
auto manufacturing center, has been poisoned by untreated drinking water from
the highly caustic Flint River.
Residents began to complain about the smell and taste of the water, as
well as hair loss, strange rashes and other maladies almost immediately after state
authorities decided to begin using the Flint River to supply drinking water in
April 2014.
State
officials initially told residents that the water was safe to drink, but four
months later, they issued a boil water advisory after coliform bacteria were
found in the water. In October of 2014,
a General Motors plant located in Flint found that the water was beginning to
corrode car parts and promptly stopped using it.
By
February, 2015, state officials knew that there was lead in the water, and not just a little bit. The Flint River’s water, which had not been
properly treated to reduce its corrosiveness, leached lead off of water
distribution pipes located underground and in inside Flint’s homes. In one home, the level of lead reached almost
400 parts per billion. Though the
Environmental Protection Agency requires action at 15 parts per billion, no
level of lead is considered to be safe.
By
September of 2015, doctors were finding high levels of lead in the blood of the
children they were treating, but state authorities continued to insist that the
water was safe. A month later, Governor
Rick Snyder appointed a task force to investigate. By the end of the year, the task force
acknowledged the seriousness of the problem and blamed the state Department of
Environmental Quality.
A declared
national state of emergency exists now in Flint, and residents have to make do
with water filters and bottled water.
It’s not been decided whether lead can be prevented from leaching out of
water pipes by additional chemical treatment or if all of the lead pipes will
have to be replaced. And nobody seems to have stepped up to
address the problems the children affected by ingesting lead-laced water are
certain to have throughout the rest of their lives.
Lots of
narratives are swirling around this catastrophe. There’s a quite reasonable “black lives
matter” narrative that holds that this is just another example of the cavalier
manner in which white authorities treat places such as Flint that have large
populations of African-Americans.
There’s another narrative that finds this is just another example of
Republican willingness to disregard public safety in order to keep taxes low
for millionaires and billionaires. And
there’s another narrative that focuses on a dysfunctional bureaucratic culture
at the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality that discouraged employees
from blowing the whistle on incidents like this and punished those
who did.
All of
these factors were probably at play. But
the real culprit here was the fact that, because of the Emergency Fiscal
Manager law, the local political officials in Flint had no power to react to
citizen complaints about the water, and the state officials who did have power
had no political incentives to use it.
Flint has
had the kinds of financial troubles that pervade hollowed out parts of the Rust
Belt. Industries shut down, people move
away, and the tax base that once supported the commitments the locality had
made to its citizens shrinks. In 2002,
Flint had been placed under the control of a state appointed “Emergency Financial
Manager‘ to deal with it’s fiscal woes.
Under the relevant law, Emergency Financial Managers assume all of the
power a locality’s elected officials ordinarily possess and local officials can
only take actions the Emergency Financial Manager allows them to take. Flint’s first experience with an Emergency
Financial Manager ended successfully in 2004.
But
promptly after the Republican sweep of the Michigan state government in 2010,
Flint found itself in dire financial straits, in part due to an $8 million cut in state aid. Governor Snyder found that Flint again
required an Emergency Financial Manager, and that’s who was in charge when
Flint began getting its water without proper treatment from the Flint River.
In a
properly functioning democracy, when a problem occurs, citizens seek redress
from their elected officials. Elected
officials tend to like their jobs, and so they are extremely sensitive to what
their constituents want. They know that
if they can’t deliver what the citizens want, they will be turned out of office
at the next election.
Michigan’s
Emergency Financial Manager law short-circuits this process. Citizens can complain about local conditions
all they want, but the Emergency Financial Manager doesn’t have any obligation
to listen to them. He or she is
appointed by the governor and holds his or her position at the governor’s
pleasure. His or her job is to find a
way for the local polity to dig its way out of debt and pay its bills. To some extent, the job is like that of a
bankruptcy trustee whose first loyalty is to the debtor’s creditors.
Ultimately,
the governor gets credit or blame for whatever the Emergency Financial Manager
does. But this doesn’t insure that the
concerns of the people in a locality will be heard. Governor Snyder is term limited and will
never again have to face the voters.
Even if he weren’t, places like Flint would probably not be high up on his
list of priorities. In the last
election, the county in which Flint is located gave almost 70% of its votes to
Snyder’s Democratic opponent. One of the
most basic rules of politics is that you serve your supporters first,
particularly if resources are limited.
What
happened in Flint was not tyranny, or at least the kind of tyranny American
democracy was born to prevent. It was,
instead, the steely indifference of rulers to people who have no adequate democratic way
of protecting themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment